Search results

I wonder what an electric nine hundred onety-one will look like.

I’m a big fan of the seven hundred and eighteen boxter in cayman.

I’d prefer if we vote on names. My vote is for the J-NACCS?. Please note the emoji is part of the name and not a reflection of my statement. You pronounce it by making the face at the end.

D: Something new.

I think that’s production assembly to keep the weight down. But you can spec it in deviated colors. ??

If were going to list everything that’s going to be out before that roadster, admin is going to have to buy more server space.

It’s not going to compete with the Tesla Roadster. It’s going to be competing with cars that exist.

Time to start crowdsourcing names. taycanandmacanand718andpossiblyothercarsbutnotthe911atleastnotrightawaymaybelaterormaybeasimilarconceptwithanewnameohandalsodontforgetaboutincludingamanualforum.com The tama7apocbnt9alnramlomascwannoaadfaiam forum.

Single site.

I don’t see anything that suggests it can do that. https://files.porsche.com/filestore/download/multimedia/none/e-performance-faq-wall-charger-connect-row/default/a5d54b9f-19bd-11eb-80cf-005056bbdc38/Porsche-Wall-Charger-Connect-Operating-and-Installation-Manual.pdf

From Chargepoint’s website: Plug-in installation with a 6-50 or 14-50 outlet requires circuits rated 40A or 50A. For other circuit ratings, including 60A-80A for 48A-50A charging, the plug is easily removed for hardwired installation. https://www.chargepoint.com/drivers/home/resource/

This doesn’t sound correct to me. 210.21(B)(1)says that a single receptacle on an individual branch circuit can’t be less than the circuit rating. Additionally, a 60A OCPD serves no purpose over a 50A OCPD in the application and allows the potential for too much current on the 14-50R...

0.4 is about right. It’s better if you tap the display and switch it to kW. That will be a higher resolution and you can see what power you’re pulling at the car.

I did try to follow up on this. Discussion here if anyone cares to follow along. Spoiler alert, it’s not a terribly productive discussion… https://www.diychatroom.com/threads/does-code-require-neutral-connection-to-14-50.724501/ I’m not sure I got a strong consensus, but if I had to go with...

Disclaimer: I’m not an electrician. Yes, that’s how I understand it. Yes. From WallWattz installation manual: And 625.22 (2017): 625.22 Personnel Protection System. The equipment shall have a listed system of protection against electric shock of personnel. Where cord-and-plug-connected...

You mean you don’t have your own copy of the NEC (NFPA 70) at home to read at your leisure? ?

Well, it’s not really about “exposed wire” as they allow supply cables up to 15’. It’s about the proximity of the shock protection to the plug.

I believe this is incorrect per NEC 625.22. I don’t have time for more explanation at the moment, but look up that article.

Something else to consider, if it really is a longer run and you’re worried about future proofing, you may want to consider a larger feed to a sub panel for the longer run and then a shorter distribution to your receptacle. My hardwired EVSE and separate receptacle are right next to a 125A...

Apologies; I didn’t say, nor did I mean to imply that you did. And I didn’t take your answer as saying that either. Really, it was just that @Tooney ‘s questions were specifically about electrical safety and code requirements and I felt I was being slightly dishonest by stating it was required...